Why Argeye
The business case for continuous controls monitoring
Point-in-time reviews are expensive, slow, and out of date the moment they're done. Moreover, when performed by tools or people with limited Workday knowledge, your compliance and monitoring program quietly becomes stale and gives false confidence, leaving you with real risk.
The cost of traditional review cycles
Traditional User Access & SoD analysis is measured in hundreds of hours
Traditional User Access and Segregation of Duties analysis and remediation typically takes anywhere from 200 to 800+ hours per review cycle. Methodologies vary widely in scope and rigor, and even the most thorough point-in-time report can't capture a configuration change made the day after it was pulled.
Automate that evidence collection and review so it happens continuously, rather than once a quarter or once a year, and the cycle collapses to a fraction of the time. The evidence is already gathered and current by the time anyone needs to look at it.
Traditional review cycle
200–800+ hrs
To complete one full User Access & SoD review, depending on methodology and scope.
Argeye
Continuous
Evidence is gathered and re-checked on an ongoing basis, so there's no discrete cycle to run.
How we compare to our competition
Capabilities Argeye ships with that competitors don't
Click any checkmark to see more details.
| Capability | Argeye | Competitors |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration Aware | ||
| Configurable Segregation of Duties rulesets | ||
| Configurable Sensitive/Privileged Access rules | ||
| Configurable Business Process Monitoring Rules | ||
| Configurable User Activity rules | ||
| Monitor Proxy Activity | ||
| Identify access conflicts for Delegated users | ||
| Centralized Risk register | ||
| Risk and Framework mapping to controls | ||
| Delivered Risks, Frameworks, and Controls | ||
| Activity Monitoring | ||
| Audit Monitoring | ||
| Configure control-scanning by Workday environment |